American Judaism’s Response to the Gaza War: Key Revelations
In his new book, “Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning,” Peter Beinart sheds light on the moral crisis facing many American Jews who staunchly defend Israel’s actions. Through a series of interconnected essays, Beinart argues for a unified state encompassing Israel and the Palestinian territories, where all individuals are granted equal rights. He delves into the narrative that shields Jews from confronting the atrocities in Gaza, urging for a shift in perspective.
My personal encounter with Beinart, whom I met nearly two decades ago while working for The New Republic, offered insights into his journey. Having previously supported the Iraq War and Joe Lieberman’s 2004 Presidential campaign, Beinart underwent a transformation, redirecting his focus towards issues surrounding Israel and American Jewry. Our recent conversation, edited for clarity and brevity, delved into his reflections on the U.S.’s reluctance to reevaluate its ties with Israel, the viability of a one-state solution, and the impact of Israel’s actions on discussions of antisemitism in America.
Challenges in Shifting Public Opinion
Reflecting on the past decade, there was optimism that American Jews, particularly the younger generation, were gravitating away from unwavering support for Israel. However, the lack of significant movement within the United States, including the Democratic Party, post-October 7th came as a surprise. Beinart highlighted the influence of factors like political funding, systemic inertia, and the deeply ingrained narrative linking the American and Israeli stories.
The Biden Administration’s reluctance to take a firm stand against Israel’s actions during the war underscored the enduring template in Washington when it comes to dealing with Israel. The fear of public backlash and the historical precedent of politicians shying away from challenging pro-Israel narratives contributed to the administration’s muted response. Beinart emphasized the need for a broader societal shift to counteract this entrenched dynamic.
The Case for a One-State Solution
Beinart’s evolution from advocating for a two-state solution to embracing a one-state alternative stemmed from a recognition of the changing realities on the ground. As Israel continued to entrench itself in the West Bank, the feasibility of a viable Palestinian state became increasingly tenuous. Drawing parallels with historical precedents of struggles for equality in divided societies, Beinart emphasized the transformative power of a mass movement advocating for human rights and democracy as the key to reshaping the Israeli-Palestinian narrative.
The discussion also delved into the complexities of defining antisemitism and critiquing Israeli policies. Beinart underscored the need to allow diverse voices within the Jewish community to engage in critical discourse without silencing dissent. By challenging the sacrosanct status of the state of Israel in Jewish institutions, Beinart highlighted the dangers of elevating statehood above human rights and dignity.
In conclusion, Beinart’s poignant analysis of American Judaism’s response to the Gaza War offers a compelling call to action. By reimagining the narrative surrounding Israel and the Palestinian territories, Beinart challenges readers to confront uncomfortable truths and advocate for a future grounded in equality and justice. As the conversation around Israel continues to evolve, Beinart’s perspective serves as a poignant reminder of the power of collective action in shaping a more equitable world.
